Minggu, April 11, 2010

Landmarks on the Road to Retirement

Landmarks on the Road to Retirement

by Rachel L. Sheedy and Susan B. Garland
Thursday, March 4, 2010
provided by

Get the skinny on these four age milestones in retirement -- and what they mean for you and your financial security.

More from Kiplinger.com:

5 Step Plan to Retire When You Want

QUIZ: Rethinking Your Retirement Plan

Kiplinger's Retirement Timeline: What You Need to Do and When

Editor's note: This article, originally published in the January 2010 issue of Kiplinger's Retirement Report, has been updated in March 2010.

You may have thought the big milestone birthdays were behind you. After becoming a teenager at 13, it only got better. As the years passed, you could legally drive, vote and hail in each New Year with a glass of bubbly.

The road to retirement has its own milestones, starting at age 59 1/2, when you can take penalty-free withdrawals from your retirement plans. Although these landmarks are not as thrilling as those earlier ones, they're just as important. Your financial security could depend on watching out for these signposts.

Penalty-Free Withdrawals at 59 1/2

On the day you turn 59 1/2, you can tap a traditional IRA without incurring a 10% early-distribution penalty. You will still owe income tax on any distribution.

Roth IRA owners who are 59 1/2 are free of the 10% penalty on withdrawn earnings (those earnings are also tax-free as long as owners have held at least one Roth for five years). Converted amounts held for less than five years are freed, too, from the penalty when an account owner reaches 59 1/2.

Owners of Roth and traditional 401(k) accounts who are 59 1/2 don't pay the penalty, either. But not all companies allow withdrawals if you're still working. If you leave your employer at age 55 or older, you can withdraw money from your employer plan without paying the early-distribution penalty.

Even though you can dip into your accounts penalty-free doesn't mean you should. The longer the money can stay in a tax shelter, the more it can grow. You won't be subject to any other penalties until you're required to take minimum distributions in 11 years. "The IRS doesn't care what you do with your money from 59 1/2 to 70 1/2," says Larry Rosenthal, president of Financial Planning Services, in Manassas, Va.

The Social Security Dilemma at 62

Deciding on when to start claiming benefits depends on a number of factors: your life expectancy, your marital status and whether you're still working. If you were born between 1943 and 1954, you can collect full benefits starting at 66. You're eligible to start claiming benefits at 62, but your benefit will be permanently reduced by a certain percentage for each month you claim before your full retirement age.

Claim at 62 and your benefits will be reduced by 25%. For each year you delay claiming benefits between 66 and 70, your benefit will increase by 8%.

The decision is easy for some. If you need the income to make ends meet, take your benefits early. If you plan to continue working, delaying makes sense. Otherwise, you will lose $1 in benefits for each $2 you earn over the earnings limit of $14,160 in 2010 -- plus you take a permanent benefit cut. The earnings limit disappears at full retirement age.

Whether you take smaller benefits earlier or larger benefits later, at some point you break even, meaning that you would have received the same amount of benefits no matter when you started. If you're single and have significant health issues that will likely shorten your life expectancy, it may make sense to claim early.

However, a lot depends on your other sources of income. Henry Hebeler, creator of AnalyzeNow.com, says a single person who collects at 62 is more likely to run out of money at an earlier age than someone with the same savings who waits until 66. You can use a free program on his site to make your own calculations.

For married couples, the decision is more complex. Taking benefits early can hurt your spouse, particularly if he or she is much younger and earns less.

Let's say a wife earned less than her husband. She is entitled to a benefit based on her own earnings or a spousal benefit that's worth up to 50% of her husband's benefit. A spouse can collect her own benefit at 62, but she can't collect a spousal benefit until her husband files for his benefit.

If he dies first, she's entitled to a survivor benefit equal to 100% of her husband's benefit, as long as she waits until 66 to collect the survivor benefit. A priority for many married couples should be to increase the benefit for the surviving spouse. If the higher-earning husband delays until 70, his survivor will get an extra 32%, plus cost-of-living adjustments.

For many couples, a husband should claim at 70, while the lower-earning spouse should start collecting at 62, according to a study by Boston College's Center for Retirement Research. Because the husband is likely to die first, the study says, he will increase the value of the survivor benefit. The authors figured that the wife's reduced benefit will be temporary because she will eventually get the higher survivor benefit.

You can run many calculations on the Social Security Web site, www.socialsecurity.gov.

Government Health-Care Coverage at 65

When you turn 65, Medicare coverage could be the best gift of all. But you will need to plan ahead. Enrollment periods vary among coverage plans, and you can get zinged by permanent late fees if you miss deadlines.

There are two main choices for getting Medicare. You can enroll in traditional Medicare, which includes Part A inpatient coverage and Part B physician services. If you go this route, you can choose a private Part D drug plan and supplemental insurance to cover co-payments and deductibles. The other choice is a private Medicare Advantage plan, which provides all-in-one coverage. With an Advantage plan, you don't need supplemental insurance, and most offer drug coverage.

Most people are eligible for premium-free Part A if they or their spouse have paid Medicare payroll taxes or are eligible for Social Security benefits. You'll be automatically enrolled if you're already receiving Social Security benefits. Otherwise, you'll need to sign up. You should contact the Social Security Administration three months before you turn 65. If you're not entitled to free Part A benefits, you may be able to buy them.

Because you must pay a premium for Part B, you can turn it down. You have seven months to sign up for Part B (as well as for Part A if you have not started receiving Social Security benefits). The seven-month period begins three months before the month of your 65th birthday and ends three months after your birthday month. If you enroll one to three months before age 65, coverage will begin the month you turn 65.

If you don't sign up during this initial enrollment period, you will have to wait until the general enrollment period from January 1 to March 31. Your monthly premium may rise permanently 10% for each 12-month period you wait beyond the initial enrollment period. New Part B beneficiaries will pay a premium of $110.50 a month in 2010, although higher-income beneficiaries will pay a bigger premium.

You won't pay a late penalty if you or a spouse still work and you're covered by a group health plan. You can sign up for Medicare during the eight-month period that begins the month after the employment ends or the group coverage ends, whichever comes first. If you have COBRA coverage, you must enroll during the eight-month period that begins the month after the employment ends.

You must have Parts A and B to buy supplemental insurance, known as a Medigap policy. Insurers can only sell federally standardized plans. Costs can vary. After you sign up for Part B, you have six months to buy a Medigap policy and you can't be turned down, regardless of your health. After six months, insurers can reject you if you have a medical condition.

You are eligible for a Part D drug plan if you have Part A or Part B, or both. You can sign up during the seven-month initial enrollment period for Parts A and B. You can also join between November 15 and December 31 each year. You may pay a permanent penalty if you do not sign up when you are first eligible. You can avoid the penalty if you can prove you have had coverage that's comparable to a Part D benefit.

Those interested in Medicare Advantage can enroll during the same seven-month initial enrollment period as Part B enrollees, or between November 15 and December 31. Late enrollment penalties also apply.

Not all Advantage plans work the same way. And unlike traditional Medicare, you may be limited in the doctors and hospitals you can visit. Your costs could be higher or lower than traditional Medicare, depending on the plan you choose.

If you have employer or retiree health coverage, call the administrator before making any changes. If your spouse needs your workplace coverage, there's a chance you could lose those benefits if you drop your own coverage or enroll in Medicare Advantage or Part D. Also, many employer and retiree plans will drop full coverage if you're eligible for Medicare.

You can get more information at Medicare.gov, where you can compare Advantage, Part D and Medigap plans.

Required Distributions Begin at 70 1/2

Age 70 1/2 heralds in required minimum distributions for owners of traditional IRAs, 401(k)s and other defined-contribution retirement plans. Roth 401(k) owners are also subject to RMDs at this age, but Roth IRA owners are not.

Generally an RMD must be taken by year-end. First-timers can choose to delay taking a distribution until April 1 of the year following the year they turn 70 1/2. Jim Gavin, a retired executive for General Motors, turned 70 1/2 in February and plans to wait to take his first RMD until the following year. "The object was to leave the IRA alone as long as possible," says Gavin, of Estero, Fla. "Right now, we can survive without it."

The April 1 after your 70 1/2 year is called your required beginning date. For example, if your 70th birthday is February 15, 2010, you would hit 70 1/2 in August. Therefore, your required beginning date is April 1, 2011. If your 70th birthday is later in the year, perhaps December 15, 2010, you wouldn't turn 70 1/2 until 2011. In that case, you would be required to take your first distribution by April 1, 2012.

There is a downside to delaying that first RMD: You'll also have to take your second distribution that same year. After the first RMD, every subsequent RMD must be taken by December 31. That means Gavin will take his first and second distributions in 2011. "You don't get a free pass," says Gregory Ostrowski, a certified financial planner at Scarborough Capital Management, in Annapolis, Md.

Before planning to double up on distributions, figure the impact on your taxes. If doubling up pushes you into a higher tax bracket for that year, you probably should take your first distribution in the year you turn 70 1/2. Deferring could make sense if your tax rate will be lower the following year or if your IRA needs more time to recover from the bear market, says Gordon Bernhardt, president of Bernhardt Wealth Management, in McLean, Va.

While the government waived RMDs for 2009, required minimum distributions from retirement accounts are back for the 2010 tax year. Those who would have had to take their first RMD in 2009 (or by April 1, 2010) will take only one distribution in 2010.

An RMD is easy to calculate. The distribution equals your account value on December 31 of the previous year divided by a factor based on your age. Factors can be found in the Uniform Lifetime Table in IRS Publication 590. (If your spouse is your beneficiary and is more than ten years younger than you, you'll use a different table.)

The factor you use is determined by the age you turn that year. For example, say in 2010 you turn 70 and hit age 70 1/2. For your first RMD, you'll use the factor, called an "applicable divisor," for age 70, which is 27.4 (the factor is based on your life expectancy). If you had $200,000 in your IRA at the end of 2009, your first RMD will be $7,299 -- $200,000 divided by 27.4.

Say you turn 70 in 2010 but hit 70 1/2 in 2011. Your first distribution year is 2011, with a delayed required date of April 1, 2012. In that case, your RMD will be based on your account value at the end of 2010 and your birthday in 2011, which will be 71.

If you decide to delay taking your first RMD until April 1 of the following year, you would still calculate the first RMD the same as if you had taken it in the year you turned 70 1/2. So if you end up taking two distributions in the same year, the amount of the distributions will be based on account values for two different years.

If you have multiple IRAs, add up your total account values and then calculate your RMD. You can take your total RMD from one IRA or spread the withdrawal over two or more IRAs, says Dean Barber, president of Barber Financial Group, in Lenexa, Kan. A separate RMD must be taken from each employer plan, such as a 401(k), that you own.

Unless you're a first-timer who delayed and has an April 1 deadline, an RMD can be taken at any time of the year. Many people wait until later in the year to let the money grow tax-deferred longer. If you want, you could withdraw the required amount in regular installments or as you need the money. Your account custodian can likely set up automatic withdrawals.

However you choose to take your RMD, get the ball rolling at least two weeks before the deadline to ensure your plan's custodian completes the transaction in time. If you don't take out the required amount, you will owe a 50% tax on any shortfall.

If you're still working at 70 1/2, you'll have to take your RMDs from your IRAs and any defined-contribution plans from former employers. But, as long as you don't own 5% or more of the company, you won't have to take an RMD from your current employer's plan.

Copyrighted, Kiplinger Washington Editors, Inc.

Preparing for the Inevitable Bursting Bubble

Preparing for the Inevitable Bursting Bubble

by Ron Lieber
Monday, March 1, 2010


provided by
The New York Times

Financial bubbles are a way of life now. They can upend your industry, send your portfolio into spasms and leave you with whiplash. And then, once you've recovered, the next one will hit.

More from NYTimes.com:

Collect Now, or Later? Timing Your Social Security Benefits

Broker? Adviser? And What's the Difference?

Your Experience in Stocks Is Probably Meaningless

Or so you might think, as a veteran of two gut-wrenching market declines and a housing bubble over the last decade.

There's plenty of reason to expect more surprises, given the number of hedge funds moving large amounts of money quickly around the world and the big banks making their own trades.

Individuals, as always, may be tempted to make their own financial bets, too. Last time, they bought overpriced homes with too much borrowed money. Next time, who knows what the bubble will be? And that's the problem, as it always is. How do you identify the next thing that will pop? Is it China? Or Greece? Or Treasury bonds? It is difficult to predict and make the right defensive (or offensive) moves at the correct moment to save or make money.

Still, if you want to better insulate yourself from bubbles -- however often they may inflate -- there are plenty of things you can do. Your debt levels matter, and you may want to consider a more flexible investment strategy. But perhaps most important, this is a mental exercise that begins and ends with an honest assessment of your long-term goals and how you handle the emotional jolts that come from the bubbles that burst along the way.

Fixed Expenses

Start with the basics. The less you have to pay toward monthly obligations, the better off you are, and that's especially true at a time of economic disruption. You certainly wouldn't want any bills increasing, so now's a good time to refinance to a fixed-rate mortgage.

Whittle down student loan and credit card debt, too, and pay cash for your car if possible. "Flexibility is priceless in a time of panic," said Lucas Hail, a financial planner with Foster & Motley in Cincinnati.

Self-Reliance

Then take a hard look at how much you should rely on promises from the government. Social Security and Medicare may not fit the traditional definition of bubbles, but that hasn't stopped Rick Brooks from advising his financial planning clients to expect less from both programs. "Something that is not sustainable will not continue. It just can't," he said of Medicare.

Mr. Brooks, the vice president for investment management with Blankinship & Foster in Solana Beach, Calif., said anyone under 50 should assume that Medicare will look nothing like it does now and examine private health insurance premiums for guidance as to what may need to be spent on health care in retirement. Meanwhile, the firm advises current retirees to assume a 20 percent cut in Social Security benefits at some point.

Bedda D'Angelo, president of Fiduciary Solutions in Durham, N.C., has an equally stark outlook on long-term employment risk. If there are two adults in the household, your goal should probably be to have two incomes instead of one. "I do believe that unemployment is inevitable," she said, adding that people who think they are going to retire at 65 should save for retirement as if they will be forced out of the work force in their mid-50s.

Portfolio Tactics

Perhaps you did what you thought you were supposed to during the last decade. You got religion and stopped trading stocks. Then, you split your assets among various low-cost mutual funds and added money regularly. And the results weren't quite what you hoped.

Tempted to make big bets on emerging markets or short Treasury bills? You've landed in the middle of the debate between those who favor a more passive asset allocation and those who prefer something called tactical allocation.

The first camp sets up a practical mix of investments, according to a target level of risk, and then readjusts back to that mix every year or so.

They frown on the hubris of the tactical practitioners. To make a tactical approach work, they note, you need to know what the right signals will be to buy and sell everything from stocks to gold, during every future market cycle. Then, these tacticians need to have the discipline to act each and every time. This is extraordinarily hard.

The tacticians, however, believe they have no choice. "What consumers need to know is that no matter how comforting it is to believe a formulaic approach or prepackaged investment product will allow them to put their financial future on autopilot, our current and future financial environment will require advice, diligence, education and responsiveness, which takes into account strategic consideration of geopolitical and economic relationships," as Ryan Darwish, a financial planner in Eugene, Ore., put it to me this week.

Mr. Darwish scoffed at the notion of mere bubbles and said he thought that more fundamental and far-reaching shifts were under way, like the transfer of economic power from the United States to China and other nations.

A growing number of financial planners are embracing a middle, more measured approach: If diversification across stocks, bonds and other asset classes has proved to be a good thing in most investing environments, why not diversification around investment approaches?

"I am not a financial genius, but the geniuses are even worse off because they're anchored on one philosophy," said David O'Brien, a financial planner in Midlothian, Va. So he and a growing number of his peers have added some strategies to their baseline portfolios aimed at losing less during bubbles while still gaining in better times. "We're not trying to shoot for the moon," he added.

These tactics can include managed futures, absolute return funds, merger arbitrage and other approaches that will get their own column someday.

The embrace of all this even led one investment professional I spoke with this week to express the ultimate sacrilege: It really is different this time.

Thomas C. Meyer of Meyer Capital Group in Marlton, N.J., noted that many of these alternative strategies were not even available in mutual-fund form three to four years ago. So that's different. He's now putting 30 percent of his clients' equity portfolios into such investments.

The big change, however, is that the baby boomer money is getting older. People are further along in their careers than they were during the market crash in 1987, and they can't rely on pensions as so many more near retirees could in the 1980s (while shrugging off stock market volatility). And the boomers don't have as much time to make up lost ground, especially if they're already retired.

"Losing less means a lot right now," Mr. Meyer said. "So we want to suck volatility out where we can."

Matter of the Mind

But can you live with less volatility -- and the permanent end of occasional portfoliowide returns in the teens or higher? Markets run on greed and fear; bubbles expand and deflate thanks to outsize versions of each. One of the few things you can predict about bubbles is that they will test your conviction on where you sit along the fear-greed continuum.

And once they pop, you'll know a bit more about how your mind works than you did before.

This last downturn was severe enough that about 10 percent of Steven A. Weydert's clients realized that they had overestimated their own risk tolerance. "Ideally, with an asset allocation, you never want to look back and say you're sorry," said Mr. Weydert of Bowyer, Weydert Wealth Planning Partners in Park Ridge, Ill.

So rather than trying to predict the number and type of bubbles, it may make more sense to look inward when trying to predict the future. Bob Goldman, a financial planner in Sausalito, Calif., said that clients often looked at him blankly when he asked them what it was they imagined for themselves in the future. Sometimes, they need to go home and figure out what sort of life it is that they're saving for -- and how much (or little) it might cost.

"People come in and talk about how we all know that inflation is going to explode next year," Mr. Goldman said. "Well, we don't all know that. We don't know anything. But we can know something about our own lives, and there is a person we can talk to about that. A person in the mirror."


http://finance.yahoo.com/retirement/article/108932/preparing-for-the-inevitable-bubble-burst;_ylt=AmOGALrb6QaMm6TKfI2oKHKfwNIF;_ylu=X3oDMTEwcjRiYzQ5BHBvcwMzBHNlYwNyX3NlY3Rpb24Ec2xrA3JlYWRtb3Jl?mod=retire-planning

Kamis, April 08, 2010

Perguruan Tinggi Setelah UU BHP Dibatalkan

Perguruan Tinggi Setelah UU BHP Dibatalkan
Kamis, 8 April 2010 | 15:44 WIB

Oleh Pangky Febriantanto

Sejak 2003 telah muncul rancangan produk hukum bernama Undang-Undang Badan Hukum Pendidikan atau UU BHP. Konsep itu diterapkan pertama kali di beberapa perguruan tinggi negeri antara lain UGM, Ul, ITB, IPB dengan status Perguruan Tinggi Badan Hukum Milik Negara.

Dalam praktiknya, UU BHP mendapat kecaman banyak kalangan mengingat pokok isinya dianggap sebagai upaya lepas tangan pemerintah dalam pembiayaan pendidikan. Pemerintah dapat secara legal memberikan kewenangan kepada institusi pendidikan untuk mengelola dana secara otonom.

Dampaknya, Perguruan Tinggi Badan Hukum Milik Negara (PT BHMN) mau tidak mau lalu membiayai proses pembelajaran dengan mandiri. Berbagai upaya dilakukan agar PT BHMN dapat hidup. Salah satunya membuka jalur khusus masuk perguruan tinggi dengan biaya mahal. Selain itu, digandeng pihak swasta dalam penyelenggaraan pendidikan. Ini dirasakan memberatkan masyarakat terutama orangtua dalam membiayai putra-putrinya mengakses pendidikan.

Tidak mengherankan apabila UU BHP yang dinilai menjadi praktik komersialisasi pendidikan mendapat resistensi yang besar dari para pengamat pendidikan, akademisi, sampai mahasiswa. Berbagai alasan logis menolak UU BHP lantang terdengar. Jika dipandang dari aspek hukum, UU BHP jelas inkonstitusional karena bertentangan dengan UUD 1945 Pasal 31 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan. Pemerintah yang seharusnya bertanggung jawab membiayai pendidikan anak bangsa kemudian melempar wewenang kepada institusi pendidikan, bahkan swasta. Ditambah lagi, banyak pasal dalam UU BHP yang dipandang bermasalah dan tidak memihak rakyat kebanyakan. Meski mendapat resistensi, UU BHP tetap disahkan melalui UU Nomor 9 Tahun 2009 tentang Badan Hukum Pendidikan. Ini berarti seluruh perguruan tinggi negeri harus dan wajib menjadi badan hukum. Langkah-langkah perjuangan menolak produk hukum tersebut terus dilakukan mulai dari diskusi, kajian, turun ke jalan, sampai permohonan judicial review.

Perjuangan panjang tersebut tidaklah sia-sia karena pada 31 Maret 2010, Mahkamah Konstitusi membatalkan UU BHP dengan mencabut UU Nomor 9 Tahun 2009 tentang Badan Hukum Pendidikan. Mahkamah Konstitusi menilai UU Nomor 9 Tahun 2009 tentang Badan Hukum Pendidikan melanggar UUD 1945 terutama Pasal 28 D Ayat 1 dan Pasal 31. Setidaknya ada lima alasan Mahkamah Konstitusi mencabut UU Nomor 9 Tahun 2009 tentang Badan Hukum Pendidikan.

1. UU BHP mempunyai banyak kelemahan baik secara yuridis, kejelasan maksud, maupun keselarasan dengan UU lain.

2.UU BHP mempunyai asumsi penyelenggara pendidikan di Indonesia mempunyai kemampuan sama. Namun, realitanya kesamaan perguruan tinggi negeri (PTN) tak berarti semua PTN mempunyai kesamaan yang sama.

3. Pemberian otonomi kepada PTN berakibat beragam. Lebih banyak PTN yang tidak mampu menghimpun dana karena keterbatasan pasar usaha di tiap daerah. Hal ini akan menyebabkan penyelenggaraan pendidikan terganggu.

4. UU BHP tidak menjamin tercapainya tujuan pendidikan nasional dan menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum. UU BHP bertentangan dengan Pasal 28 D Ayat 1 dan Pasal 31 UUD 1945.

5. Prinsip nirlaba tak hanya bisa diterapkan dalam BHP, tetapi juga dalam bentuk badan hukum lainnya.

Keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi ini tentu disambut hangat dengan keceriaan.

Tantangan baru

Namun, pertanyaan yang timbul dari keputusan tersebut adalah keberlangsungan perguruan tinggi terutama PT BHMN. PT BHMN seperti UGM (Yogyakarta), UI (Jakarta), ITB (Bandung), IPB (Bogor), Undip (Semarang), Unair (Surabaya), USU (Medan), dan UPI (Bandung) yang sudah menerapkan konsep UU BHP kini mendapat tantangan baru. Perguruan tinggi-perguruan tinggi tersebut siap naik status ke Badan Hukum Pendidikan karena sudah sukses melaksanakan konsep BHP dalam bentuk PT BHMN, di tengah jalan status tersebut goyah dengan batalnya UU BHP.

Pertanyaannya, bagaimana pengelolaan dana dan sistem pendidikan di perguruan tinggi-perguruan tinggi tersebut setelah UU BHP dicabut. Sudah sewajarnya apabila perguruan tinggi-perguruan tinggi tersebut patuh akan keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi ini. Mereka perlu pemikiran yang cerdas mengingat sudah beberapa tahun konsep UU BHP dilaksanakan.

Salah satu contohnya UGM. Perguruan tinggi yang terkenal dengan sebutan kampus nasional, kampus Pancasila, kampus perjuangan, dan kampus kerakyatan tersebut dipertanyakan keberlangsungannya. Keberlangsungan pengelolaan yang beradaptasi dengan batalnya UU BHP. Ini sejalan dengan adanya ketakutan meski UU BHP dibatalkan, praktik otonomi kampus yang bersifat memberatkan mahasiswa masih hidup. Mengingat, mahasiswa adalah agent of change dalam menentukan nasib masa depan bangsa dan negeri tercinta. Sudah harusnya mahasiswa diberi kemudahan dalam proses pembelajaran di kampus.

Selama ini UGM dan tujuh PT BHMN lain mengelola pendanaan dan pendidikan secara mandiri tanpa intervensi kuat dari pemerintah pusat. Kini jika mematuhi keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, kebijakan dan pendanaan pendidikan di delapan perguruan tinggi tersebut kembali diatur oleh pemerintah pusat. Contoh konkrit yang akan dihadapi adalah jika akan melakukan penelitian atas nama kampus yang berskala besar. Dana yang dibutuhkan bisa tidak akan dicari dari pihak kampus maupun swasta. Namun, pengelola penelitian tersebut mengajukan permohonan dana kepada pemerintah pusat. Contoh yang lain adalah banyaknya jalur khusus masuk perguruan tinggi yang dinilai komersial kini dapat berubah. Jalur masuk bisa jadi menjadi lebih mudah diakses oleh berbagai kalangan dan status sosial.

Lalu, bagaimana kesiapan perguruan tinggi-perguruan tinggi tersebut menghadapi tantangantantangan pasta dicabutnya UU BHP? Apa yang akan disiapkan dan program apa saja dalam implementasinya? Mari kita tunggu dan kita kawal pelaksanaannya.

PANGKY FEBRIANTANTO Mahasiswa Ilmu Administrasi Negara Fisipol UGM, Deputi (Sekjend) Kementerian Aksi dan Propaganda BEM KM

Pengelolaan PTN dan BHMPTN Tak Berdampak

Mendiknas: Pengelolaan PTN dan BHMPTN Tak Berdampak
Laporan wartawan KOMPAS Suhartono
Kamis, 8 April 2010 | 19:47 WIB

JAKARTA, KOMPAS.com- Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Muhammad Nuh memastikan, dampak dari pembatalan Undang-Undang No. 9 Tahun 2009 tentang Badan Hukum Pendidikan (UU BHP) hanya pada pengelolaan Universitas Pertahanan. Pasalnya, dasar hukum pendirian unversitas hasil kerjasama Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional dan Kementerian Pertahanan dan Keamanan yang baru berumur satu tahun ini mencantol pada UU BHP.

Adapun terhadap pengelolaan perguruan tinggi negeri (PTN) dan Badan Hukum Milik Perguruan Tinggi Negeri (BHMPTN), pengelolaannya justru tidak mencantol pada UU BHP, melaikan mencantol ke Peraturan Pemerintah No. 17 Tahun 2001 tentang Pengelolaan dan Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan. PP ini mengacu kepada UU Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Demikian disampaikan Muhammad Nuh menjawab pers, seusai menemani Wakil Presiden Boediono melepas lima siswa pemenang Lomba Karya Ilmiah Remaja Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI) untuk mengikuti Intel International Science and Engineering Fair (Intel ISEF) 2010 di Istana Wapres, Jakarta, Kamis (8/4/2010).

"Oleh sebab itu, terkait dengan pembatalan UU BHP oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK), maka pemerintah harus mengamankan universitas itu dengan PP atau dengan peraturan menteri," tandas Nuh.

Sebab, tambah Nuh, jika tidak Universitas Pertahanan tidak memiliki payung hukum sehingga operasional universitas yang didasarkan pada Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara (APBN), juga tidak memiliki landasan hukum lagi.

Menurut Nuh, pemerintah juga harus mengamankan PP No. 61 Tahun 1999 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi dan PP No. 61 Tahun 1999 tentang Penetapan Perguruan Tinggi sebagai Badan Hukum. Kedua PP ini sebelumnya telah dianulir dengan PP No. 17 Tahun 2001.

Tentang pengelolaan PTN, lanjut Nuh, masih cukup aman. "Akan tetapi, semangatnya kita ingin melakukan redesain dan landscape yang baru bagi dunia pendidikan tinggi kita," kata Nuh.

Presiden minta dibahas di ratas

Terkait itu, Nuh menyatakan, Presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono telah meminta dirinya untuk menyelesaikan rancangan penataan ulang perguruan tinggi negeri pascapembatalan UU BHP. "Presiden sudah meminta agar Senin (12/4) mendatang, dalam Rapat Terbatas, saya harus sudah menyelesaikan rancangan dan mengajukan langkah-langkah pasca pembatalan UU BHP," ujar Nuh.

Lebih jauh, Nuh menyatakan dalam perguruan tinggi ada lima komponen, yaitu tata kelola, kurikulum dan metodelogi, tenaga pendidik dan kependidikan, mahasiswa, serta struktur pembiayaan. "Terkait penataan PTN, lima komponen itu masih dikaji lagi oleh kami dan kami akan meletakan obyektif orientasi dari pendidikan tinggi sehingga dapat diletakkan bagaimana mencerdaskan bangsa melalui pendidikan yang berkualitas secara operasional dalam jangka lima tahun," tandas Nuh.

Untuk menyusun landscape penataan ulang perguruan tinggi pascapembatalan UU BHP, Nuh mengatakan akan mengundang seluruh komponen masyarakat dan pemangku kepentingan di bidang pendidikan.

"Orientasi pendidikan diarahkan untuk menjawab kepentingan rakyat. Harus ada jaminan bahwa isu yang mengatakan bahwa pendidikan hanya untuk orang yang mampu, itu tidak benar. Kita harus menekankan benar bahwa pendidikan itu untuk semua dan memberikan afirmatif (keberpihakan) kepada mereka yang tidak beruntung karena ekonomi," demikiam Nuh.


Editor: msh

Pengantin Cilik Yaman Tewas Akibat Pendarahan Kelamin

Pengantin Cilik Yaman Tewas Akibat Pendarahan Kelamin
Kamis, 8 April 2010 | 17:03 WIB
The Sun
Polisi mengendong 2 anak yang dinikahkan dalam suatu acara yang dihadiri oleh 100 tamu. Kedua anak itu adalah pengantin perempuan (kiri) yang masih berusia 4 tahun dan pengantin pria yang masih berusia 7 tahun
TERKAIT:

SANAA, KOMPAS.com - Seorang gadis belia Yaman berusia 13 tahun, yang dipaksa menikah, tewas lima hari setelah pernikahannya karena menderita kerusakan organ seksual dan pembuluh darahnya pecah.

Forum Hak Asasi Manusia Shaqaeq Arab dalam sebuah pernyataan yang mengutip laporan medis, Kamis (8/4/2010), menyebutkan, Ilham Mahdi al-Assi, nama gadis malang itu, meninggal Jumat di rumah sakit al-Thawra, di Provinsi Hajja di utara ibukota negara itu. Ilham dikawinkan, Senin, dalam sebuah pengaturan tradisional yang dikenal sebagai "pertukaran perkawinan". Dalam tradisi semacam itu, saudara laki-laki pengantin perempuan juga menikah dengan saudari perempuan pengantin pria.

"Anak kecil Ilham itu telah meninggal sebagai martir akibat pelecehan terhadap kehidupan anak-anak di Yaman," kata organisasi non-pemerintah tersebut. "Kematiannya merupakan contoh keji dari penentangan terhadap pernikahan dini di Yaman, yang menyebabkan terjadinya pembunuhan terhadap anak-anak perempuan," kata laporan itu.

Pernikahan gadis-gadis muda merupakan hal lumrah di Yaman yang memiliki struktur kesukuan kuat. Kematian seorang gadis 12 tahun saat melahirkan pada September tahun lalu juga menggambarkan kasus kematian pengatin di negara itu. Banyak dari mereka bahkan menikah sebelum memasuki masa puber.

Kontroversi telah meningkat di Yaman belakangan ini terkait adanya undang-undang yang melarangan pernikahan anak di negara miskin itu. Berdasarkan undang-undang itu, usia minimum bagi perempuan untuk menikah adalah 17 tahun dan bagi laki-laki 18 tahun.

Namun undang-undang itu banyak ditentang. Ribuan perempuan konservatif berdemonstrasi di luar gedung parlemen bulan lalu. Mereka mengikuti seruan partai-partai Islam yang menentang undang-undang tersebut. Hanya sejumlah kecil perempuan yang berunjuk rasa di tempat yang sama beberapa hari kemudian untuk mendukung undang-undang itu. Pelaksanaan undang-udang itu ditunda karena masih harus ditinjau ulang parlemen. Namun hingga kini permintaan peninjauan belum juga diajukan.


Penulis: EGP | Editor: aegi | Sumber : AFP

Rabu, April 07, 2010

PTN Cenderung Pilih BLU

PTN Cenderung Pilih BLU
Laporan wartawan KOMPAS Ester Lince Napitupulu
Senin, 5 April 2010 | 21:05 WIB

JAKARTA, KOMPAS.com - Perguruan tinggi negeri cenderung untuk memilih status badan layanan umum setelah perubahan menjadi badan hukum pendidikan dibatalkan menyusul keputusan Mahkamah Agung yang membatalkan Undang-undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2009 tentang Badan Hukum Pendidikan. Status badan layanan umum memberikan keleluasaan dan otonomi bagi perguruan tinggi negeri untuk mengelola sendiri keuangan dalam melaksanakan tri darma perguruan tinggi di kampus masing-masing.

Zainal Rafli, Pembantu Rektor I Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Senin (5/4/2010), mengatakan BHP tadinya diharapkan menjadi payung hukum adanya otonomi penuh PTN untuk mengembangkan diri. "Tetapi BHP kan sudah batal. Dengan pilihan jadi badan layanan umum atau BLU saja sudah cukup melegakan buat PTN. Tetapi PTN harus mengajukan proposal untuk bisa berubah dari PTN biasa jadi BLU," kata Zainal.

Menurut Zainal, UNJ baru menjadi BLU pada November lalu. Pemasukan dana dari masyarakat dan pemerintah bisa dikelola sendiri yang tetap dipertanggungjawabkan penggunaannya kepada negara.

"Jadi tidak mesti menunggu cair dulu dari kas negara yang memakan waktu lama. Belum lagi jika ada perubahan dari program yang diajukan, prosesnya semakin lama. Dengan jadi BLU, UNJ sudah semakin leluasa untuk melaksanakan program tanpa harus menunggu acc lama dari Departemen Keuangan," jelas Zainal.

Sementara itu, hingga Senin malam, semua rektor PTN dan politeknik negeri menghadiri rapat kerja dengan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Mohammad Nuh. Pembahasan terkait dengan penyesuaian tata kelola PTN pascadibatalkannya UU BHP.

Editor: Edj

http://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2010/04/05/2105421/PTN.Cenderung.Pilih.BLU

PTN Dibiarkan Berkembang Sesuai Kemampuan

PTN Dibiarkan Berkembang Sesuai Kemampuan
Selasa, 6 April 2010 | 20:12 WIB

JAKARTA, KOMPAS.com - Pengelolaan perguruan tinggi negeri (PTN) tetap diberikan otonomi untuk berkembang tanpa melanggar ketentuan hukum setelah dibatalkannya Undang-undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2009 tentang Badan Hukum Pendidikan. Pemerintah akan membuat payung hukum baru untuk mengakomodasi perkembangan PTN yang kondisinya berbeda-beda tersebut.

Untuk PTN yang sudah maju, seperti yang ditunjukkan PTN BHMN, tetap diberikan ruang.
-- Fasli Jalal.

Wakil Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Fasli Jalal di Jakarta, Selasa (6/4/2010), mengatakan semangat menciptakan otonomi setiap perguruan tinggi di bidang keilmuan, keuangan, pengelolaan, dan aset tetap diakomodir dalam peraturan pemerintah yang tidak betentangan dengan amanah Mahkamah Konstiusi.

"Untuk PTN yang sudah maju, seperti yang ditunjukkan PTN BHMN, tetap diberikan ruang. Tetapi kita buat PTN BHMN yang ramah pada masyarakat, yang artinya ada kontrol dari pemerintah dalam pungutan uang dari mahasiswa," kata Fasli.

Menurut Fasli, pemerintah telah menerima masukan dari kalangan PTN. Karena itu, pemerintah akan mendukung apakah PTN akan mengembangkan diri menjadi PTN dengan tata kelola seperti BHMN, badan layanan umum, atau PTN biasa.

Pemerintah akan menguji kelayakan PTN untuk membebani pembiayaan pada masyarakat, termasuk untuk PTN BHMN. Adapun untuk PTN biasa akan dicari kemungkinan supaya mendapat keleluasaan dalam pengelolaan keuangan yang sesuai dinamisasi di dalam tiap kampus meskipun tidak sebagai badan layanan umum.

Saat ini, sebanyak tujuh PTN berstatus sebagai PTN BHMN yakni Universitas Indonesia, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, dan Universitas Airlangga. Sebanyak 20 PTN lainnya berstatus badan layanan umum, dan 83 PTN biasa.


Penulis: ELN | Editor: made

http://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2010/04/06/2012406/PTN.Dibiarkan.Berkembang.Sesuai.Kemampuan

Copenhagen Accord Kurang Efektif

Copenhagen Accord Kurang Efektif
Laporan wartawan KOMPAS Dwi Bayu Radius
Jumat, 2 April 2010 | 10:56 WIB

BANDUNG, KOMPAS.com — Kesepakatan Copenhagen Accord (CA) dianggap kurang efektif karena sifatnya tidak mengikat. Negara-negara yang terlibat dalam kesepakatan itu hanya melakukan take note (mencatat). Jika ingin mengikat, kesepakatan itu berbentuk legal binding.

Kepala Badan Pengembangan dan Pengkajian Kebijakan (BPPK) Kementerian Luar Negeri Artauli RMP Tobing di Bandung, Jumat (2/4/2010), mengatakan, CA merupakan hasil Konferensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa (PBB) terkait perubahan iklim ke-15 atau COP 15. Konferensi itu diselenggarakan pada 7-19 Desember 2009 di Kopenhagen, Denmark.

Kesepakatan CA yang dilakukan dengan take note membuat pemberlakuannya tak menerapkan sanksi. Status yang tak mengikat akan membawa implikasi-implikasi tertentu bagi upaya global dalam menangani dampak perubahan iklim. Terlepas adanya kekurangan dalam proses perumusan CA, Indonesia menyambut baik kesepakatan itu. Pihak COP 15 telah menghasilkan beberapa langkah maju.

Penetapan pembatasan peningkatan suhu global 2 derajat celsius dan komitmen negara maju untuk menyediakan pendanaan sebesar 30 miliar dollar AS pada tahun 2010-2012 merupakan beberapa langkah maju tersebut. Selain itu, usulan Indonesla tentang peranan pengelolaan hutan dalam upaya penanganan dampak perubahan iklim juga diadopsi COP 15.

Indonesia termasuk negara yang mengasosiasikan diri pada kesepakatan tersebut. Pemerintah Indonesia telah menyerahkan National Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) yang berisi upaya-upaya dalam mitigasi perubahan iklim secara nasional.

Secara proaktif, Indonesia telah menyampaikan komitmen untuk menurunkan emisi secara sukarela sebesar 26 persen pada tahun 2010 atau mencapai 41 persen sekiranya diperoleh bantuan pendaan dari luar negeri. Komitmen tersebut mendapatkan apresiasi dan dukungan banyak pihak yang tecermin dari berbagai komitmen bantuan pihak bilateral, seperti Inggris, Jerman, Italia, dan Jepang.


Editor: acandra

http://sains.kompas.com/read/2010/04/02/1056390/Copenhagen.Accord.Kurang.Efektif..